of UK undergraduates use generative AI to help with assessed work.
AI use is now normalised. A credible submission no longer reliably proves independent understanding.
HEPI Student Generative AI Survey 2026 · 1,054 UK undergraduates
Confidential investor briefing · July 2026
Proof of understanding
for the age of AI.
Integrevise is learning and knowledge verification infrastructure. It gives institutions scalable evidence that learners genuinely understand what they submit.
Live verification workflow
From submission to proofGrounding context
01Submission
02Assignment brief
03Rubric + outcomes
Adaptive oralConversation in contextEach answer shapes the next question
Tutor evidence
UnderstandingVerified
Structured for academic review01Transcript
02Recording
03Response analysis
04Learner feedback
One learner journey. A complete, auditable evidence trail for tutor review.
3University pilots completed
1Peer-reviewed publication
87%Found the system easy to use*
2026Digital Startup of the Year
01 · The shift
Written work is easier to produce than it is to trust.
Generative AI has broken the historic link between a credible submission and genuine learner understanding.
Detection, declarations and blanket bans focus on how work was produced. Institutions ultimately need to know whether the learner understands it.
Written workCan look credible
Genuine understandingCan no longer be inferred
A credible submission no longer proves the learner understands it.
02 · The infrastructure
From submitted work to reviewable evidence.
The oral session is one stage within a wider workflow that begins before the learner speaks and continues through structured academic review.
Set the context
The educator supplies the assignment brief, rubric, learning outcomes and session rules.
Analyse the work
The learner submission is assessed for strengths, gaps and areas requiring deeper verification.
Build the viva
Questions are generated from that learner’s own work and grounded in the educator’s criteria.
Conduct the conversation
A short real-time oral explores understanding, follows context and re-queries where depth is missing.
Evaluate responses
Understanding, critical thinking and communication are analysed against the rubric and learning outcomes.
Deliver the evidence
Tutors receive the RAG result, scoring rationale, flags, transcript and recording. Learners receive immediate feedback.
Institutional value
Reduce academic time from 4 – 6 hours to under 20 minutes per student.
Integrevise handles preparation, scheduling and the oral conversation. Tutors retain academic authority and review the resulting evidence.
Current approach4 – 6 hours
IntegreviseUnder 20 minutes
90%+less academic time per student
Illustrative comparison with the current tutor-led approach. Detailed assumptions are available in diligence.
03 · Evidence
Evidence, not product claims.
Integrevise has been tested in UK and US university settings, with research spanning assessment quality, learner experience and the ability to surface gaps hidden by written work.
Peer-reviewed research
Journal publishedLindenwood University
A longitudinal deployment found that the oral workflow surfaced gaps in understanding and application that were not visible in written submissions alone.
Published in Trends in Higher EducationControlled study
University researchCardiff University
A controlled study produced promising evidence that Integrevise can conduct structured oral assessment consistently alongside established tutor-led practice.
View Cardiff University case studyLearner experience
Observed adoptionDesigned for adoption
Early testing found 87% of participating learners considered the system easy to use. A later adoption report recorded 69% positive feedback and 7.8/10 average confidence.
*Early user testing result. Sample sizes and study methodology are available in the controlled data room.
04 · Traction
Validated across institutions. Moving into paid adoption.
The product has progressed beyond a concept. It has been tested in UK and US university settings, published through peer review and discussed with academics, assessment leaders and sector distribution organisations.
50+problem-discovery conversations with academics and assessment leaders, shaping product fit
3completed university pilots
1peer-reviewed publication
UK + USuniversity validation settings
Research validation is moving into a commercial relationship.
A completed longitudinal pilot produced a peer-reviewed study. An LOI is signed and commercial-contract discussions are under way.
Why it mattersThe same institution that helped validate the workflow has documented its interest in continuing towards paid adoption.
Controlled validation is progressing towards a commercial contract.
A controlled university study is complete. An LOI is signed and discussions on commercial deployment are under way.
Why it mattersIndependent university testing has moved beyond research interest into a documented route towards paid adoption.
A potential sector-level route into UK tertiary education.
Jisc is the UK sector’s not-for-profit digital, data and technology organisation for tertiary education and research. A collaboration and member-institution pilot route is under discussion.
Why it mattersIf agreed, Jisc’s sector relationships and procurement routes could shorten repeated university buying processes and create a repeatable distribution lane.
Marketplace presence creates global enterprise visibility.
Integrevise is listed in Microsoft Marketplace, a recognised catalogue through which organisations discover and purchase partner solutions.
Why it mattersPuts the product in front of Microsoft buyers and creates a future route to transact through procurement systems organisations already use.
Organisation marks are shown for factual identification only.
05 · The round
Building the category leader in proof of understanding.
A £1.2m pre-seed round is planned to scale institutional go-to-market, develop proprietary assessment intelligence, harden the product and fund further academic validation.
Commercial milestone£1m ARRTargeting 17 institutional customers within the funded runway.
Target raise£1.2m
Commercial figures are planning assumptions and milestones, not forecasts or contracted revenue.
06 · Investor materials
How investors access the materials.
Materials are shared in stages as investor conversations and diligence progress.
Public briefing→Investor conversation→Investor Room→Diligence Vault
Public briefing
The investment thesis, product workflow, published evidence, traction, commercial milestone and round overview.
Investor Room
Investor deck, full case-study pack, pricing and GTM detail, milestones, use of funds and high-level forecasts.
Diligence Vault
Financial model, cap table, legal and corporate records, contracts and LOIs, IP, security and data-protection materials.
Planned pre-seed · September 2026